“I believe it is incumbent on the Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) and/or System Integrators (SIs) to understand the regulatory and compliance-related issues that their customers face,” noted Manjula Talreja, VP of Global Cloud Business Development at Cisco, in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “Of course these issues are different in each industry and in each country.”
Cloud Computing Journal: The move to cloud isn't about saving money, it is about saving time - ...| By Business Wire | Article Rating: |
|
| January 28, 2013 04:02 PM EST | Reads: |
639 |
Seagate Technology plc (NASDAQ: STX) (the “Company”) today reported financial results for the quarter ended December 28, 2012. During the fiscal second quarter, the Company reported revenue of approximately $3.7 billion, shipping 58 million units. On a GAAP basis, Seagate reported gross margin of 27.0%, net income of $492 million and diluted earnings per share of $1.30. On a non-GAAP basis, which excludes the net impact of certain items, Seagate reported gross margin of 27.6%, net income of $523 million and diluted earnings per share of $1.38. Cash flow from operations in the quarter was $844 million and the Company returned $1.1 billion to shareholders in dividends and share redemptions. Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and short-term investments totaled approximately $2.0 billion at the end of the fiscal second quarter.
“Seagate is executing well in an environment where customer demand forecasting is challenging,” said Steve Luczo, Seagate’s chairman, president and chief executive officer. “Looking ahead, we will continue to manage our business conservatively to the demand environment, focus on profitability and effectively invest for market leadership in storage for mobility, cloud and open source. Creating value for shareholders remains a top priority, and in the first half of fiscal 2013, we returned over 95% of operating cash flows through share redemptions and dividends.”
For a detailed reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results, see accompanying financial tables.
Seagate has issued a Supplemental Commentary document. The Supplemental Commentary will not be read during today's call, but rather it is available in the investors section of seagate.com.
Quarterly Cash Dividend
The Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly cash dividend to $0.38 per share which was paid on December 28, 2012, rather than in the March 2013 quarter. The payment of any future quarterly dividends will be at the discretion of the Board and will be dependent upon Seagate's financial position, results of operations, available cash, cash flow, capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by the Board.
Investor Communications
Seagate management will hold a public webcast today at 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time that can be accessed on its Investor Relations website at www.seagate.com/investors. During today's webcast, the Company will provide an outlook for its third fiscal quarter of 2013 including key underlying assumptions.
Replay
A replay will be available beginning today at approximately 6:00 p.m. Pacific Time at www.seagate.com/investors.
About Seagate
Seagate is a world leader in hard disk drives and storage solutions. Learn more at www.seagate.com.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, including, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects and estimates of industry growth for the fiscal quarter ending March 29, 2013 and beyond. These statements identify prospective information and include words such as “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “projects” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on information available to the Company as of the date of this press release and are based on management's current views and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are conditioned upon and also involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those anticipated by these forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties, and other factors may be beyond the Company’s control and may pose a risk to the Company’s operating and financial condition. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: the uncertainty in global economic conditions, as consumers and businesses may defer purchases in response to tighter credit and financial news; the impact of the variable demand and adverse pricing environment for disk drives, particularly in view of current business and economic conditions; dependence on the Company’s ability to successfully qualify, manufacture and sell its disk drive products in increasing volumes on a cost-effective basis and with acceptable quality, particularly the new disk drive products with lower cost structures; the impact of competitive product announcements; possible excess industry supply with respect to particular disk drive products; and the Company’s ability to achieve projected cost savings in connection with restructuring plans. Information concerning additional factors that could cause results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements are contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on August 8, 2012 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC on October 31, 2012, which statements are incorporated into this press release by reference. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing the Company’s views as of any subsequent date and the Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date they were made.
|
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In millions) (Unaudited) |
|||||||
|
December 28, 2012 |
June 29, |
||||||
| ASSETS | |||||||
| Current assets: | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,383 | $ | 1,707 | |||
| Short-term investments | 489 | 411 | |||||
| Restricted cash and investments | 98 | 93 | |||||
| Accounts receivable, net | 1,648 | 2,319 | |||||
| Inventories | 800 | 909 | |||||
| Deferred income taxes | 112 | 104 | |||||
| Other current assets | 487 | 767 | |||||
| Total current assets | 5,017 | 6,310 | |||||
| Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net | 2,228 | 2,284 | |||||
| Goodwill | 476 | 463 | |||||
| Other intangible assets, net | 480 | 506 | |||||
| Deferred income taxes | 409 | 396 | |||||
| Other assets, net | 132 | 147 | |||||
| Total Assets | $ | 8,742 | $ | 10,106 | |||
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |||||||
| Current liabilities: | |||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 1,685 | $ | 2,286 | |||
| Accrued employee compensation | 287 | 344 | |||||
| Accrued warranty | 195 | 235 | |||||
| Accrued expenses | 473 | 531 | |||||
| Current portion of long-term debt | 3 | — | |||||
| Total current liabilities | 2,643 | 3,396 | |||||
| Long-term accrued warranty | 135 | 128 | |||||
| Long-term accrued income taxes | 84 | 84 | |||||
| Other non-current liabilities | 140 | 138 | |||||
| Long-term debt, less current portion | 2,815 | 2,863 | |||||
| Total Liabilities | 5,817 | 6,609 | |||||
| Equity: | |||||||
| Total Equity | 2,925 | 3,497 | |||||
| Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 8,742 | $ | 10,106 | |||
The information as of June 29, 2012 was derived from the Company’s audited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 29, 2012.
|
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In millions, except per share data) (Unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||
| For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
|
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 3,668 | $ | 3,195 | $ | 7,400 | $ | 6,007 | ||||||||
| Cost of revenue | 2,676 | 2,185 | 5,347 | 4,448 | ||||||||||||
| Product development | 277 | 259 | 545 | 467 | ||||||||||||
| Marketing and administrative | 139 | 141 | 289 | 245 | ||||||||||||
| Amortization of intangibles | 20 | 2 | 39 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Restructuring and other, net | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 3,113 | 2,590 | 6,221 | 5,166 | ||||||||||||
| Income from operations | 555 | 605 | 1,179 | 841 | ||||||||||||
| Interest income | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (55 | ) | (58 | ) | (111 | ) | (127 | ) | ||||||||
| Other, net | (3 | ) | 9 | 27 | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
| Other expense, net | (56 | ) | (47 | ) | (80 | ) | (132 | ) | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 499 | 558 | 1,099 | 709 | ||||||||||||
| Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | 7 | (5 | ) | 25 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Net income | 492 | 563 | 1,074 | 703 | ||||||||||||
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to Seagate Technology plc | $ | 492 | $ | 563 | $ | 1,074 | $ | 703 | ||||||||
| Net income per share attributable to Seagate Technology plc ordinary shareholders: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 1.33 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 2.81 | $ | 1.66 | ||||||||
| Diluted | 1.30 | 1.28 | 2.73 | 1.61 | ||||||||||||
| Number of shares used in per share calculations: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 369 | 427 | 382 | 424 | ||||||||||||
| Diluted | 379 | 439 | 394 | 436 | ||||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared per Seagate Technology plc ordinary share | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||||
|
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In millions) (Unaudited) |
||||||||
| For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||
|
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
|||||||
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
| Net income | $ | 1,074 | $ | 703 | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 430 | 373 | ||||||
| Share-based compensation | 36 | 26 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes | (11 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
| Gain on sale of strategic investments | (33 | ) | — | |||||
| Gain on sale of property and equipment | (8 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||
| Loss on redemption of debt | 6 | 5 | ||||||
| Other non-cash operating activities, net | 5 | 10 | ||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts receivable, net | 683 | (130 | ) | |||||
| Inventories | 156 | 181 | ||||||
| Accounts payable | (496 | ) | (500 | ) | ||||
| Accrued employee compensation | (62 | ) | 56 | |||||
| Accrued expenses, income taxes and warranty | (97 | ) | (34 | ) | ||||
| Other assets and liabilities | 293 | 207 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,976 | 879 | ||||||
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
| Acquisition of property, equipment and leasehold improvements | (427 | ) | (361 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment | 4 | 9 | ||||||
| Purchases of short-term investments | (168 | ) | (309 | ) | ||||
| Sales of short-term investments | 125 | 260 | ||||||
| Maturities of short-term investments | 21 | 115 | ||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of strategic investments | 42 | (5 | ) | |||||
| Cash used in acquisition of LaCie S.A., net of cash acquired | (36 | ) | — | |||||
| Cash used in acquisition of Samsung HDD assets and liabilities | — | (561 | ) | |||||
| Other investing activities, net | (14 | ) | 9 | |||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (453 | ) | (843 | ) | ||||
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
| Repayments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations | (58 | ) | (594 | ) | ||||
| Repurchases of ordinary shares | (1,510 | ) | (191 | ) | ||||
| Dividends to shareholders | (377 | ) | (154 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares under employee stock plans | 168 | 51 | ||||||
| Escrow deposit for acquisition of noncontrolling shares of LaCie S.A. | (72 | ) | — | |||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (1,849 | ) | (888 | ) | ||||
| Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 2 | — | ||||||
| Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (324 | ) | (852 | ) | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 1,707 | 2,677 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | $ | 1,383 | $ | 1,825 | ||||
Use of non-GAAP financial information
To supplement the condensed consolidated financial statements presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the Company provides non-GAAP measures of net income, diluted net income per share and gross margin as a percentage of revenue, which are adjusted from results based on GAAP to exclude certain expenses, gains and losses. These non-GAAP financial measures are provided to enhance the user's overall understanding of the Company’s current financial performance and our prospects for the future. Specifically, the Company believes non-GAAP results provide useful information to both management and investors as these non-GAAP results exclude certain expenses, gains and losses that we believe are not indicative of our core operating results and because it is consistent with the financial models and estimates published by financial analysts who follow the Company.
These non-GAAP results are some of the primary measurements management uses to assess the Company’s performance, allocate resources and plan for future periods. Reported non-GAAP results should only be considered as supplemental to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, and not considered as a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results. These non-GAAP measures may differ from the non-GAAP measures reported by other companies in our industry.
|
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC ADJUSTMENTS TO GAAP NET INCOME AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE (In millions, except per share amounts) (Unaudited) |
|||||||||
|
For the Three |
For the Six |
||||||||
| GAAP net income | $ | 492 | $ | 1,074 | |||||
| Non-GAAP adjustments: | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue | A | 19 | 39 | ||||||
| Product development | B | 3 | 7 | ||||||
| Marketing and administrative | C | (17 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
| Amortization of intangibles | D | 20 | 39 | ||||||
| Restructuring and other, net | D | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Other expense, net | E | 5 | (30 | ) | |||||
| Non-GAAP net income | $ | 523 | $ | 1,117 | |||||
| Diluted net income per share: | |||||||||
| GAAP | $ | 1.30 | $ | 2.73 | |||||
| Non-GAAP | $ | 1.38 | $ | 2.84 | |||||
| Shares used in diluted net income per share calculation | 379 | 394 | |||||||
|
A |
For the three months ended December 28, 2012, Cost of revenue on a GAAP basis totaled $2,676 million, while non-GAAP Cost of revenue, which excludes the net impact of certain adjustments, was $2,657 million. For the six months ended December 28, 2012, Cost of revenue on a GAAP basis totaled $5,347 million, while non-GAAP Cost of revenue, which excludes the net impact of certain adjustments, was $5,308 million. The non-GAAP adjustments include amortization of intangibles and other acquisition related expenses associated with the December 2011 acquisition of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd's hard disk drive business (the "Samsung HDD business") and the August 2012 acquisition of LaCie S.A. ("LaCie"). | |
|
B |
For the three and six months ended December 28, 2012, Product development expense has been adjusted on a non-GAAP basis to exclude the net impact of acquisition and integration costs associated with the acquisition of the Samsung HDD business. | |
|
C |
For the three and six months ended December 28, 2012, Marketing and administrative expense has been adjusted on a non-GAAP basis to exclude the net impact of legal cost reimbursements, which were partially offset by acquisition and integration costs associated with the acquisitions of Samsung's HDD business and LaCie. | |
|
D |
For the three and six months ended December 28, 2012, Amortization of intangibles related to our Samsung HDD business and LaCie acquisitions and Restructuring and other, net, primarily related to prior year restructuring plans, have been excluded on a non-GAAP basis. | |
|
E |
For the three months ended December 28, 2012, Other expense has been adjusted on a non-GAAP basis primarily to exclude the net impact of a loss recognized on the redemption of certain of our 7.75% senior notes. | |
| For the six months ended December 28, 2012, Other expense has been adjusted on a non-GAAP basis primarily to exclude the net impact of a gain recognized upon sales of certain strategic investments, partially offset by a loss recognized on the redemption of certain of our 7.75% senior notes. |
Published January 28, 2013 Reads 639
Copyright © 2013 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Business Wire
Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
“I believe it is incumbent on the Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) and/or System Integrators (SIs) to understand the regulatory and compliance-related issues that their customers face,” noted Manjula Talreja, VP of Global Cloud Business Development at Cisco, in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “Of course these issues are different in each industry and in each country.”
Cloud Computing Journal: The move to cloud isn't about saving money, it is about saving time - ...Jun. 17, 2013 07:00 AM EDT Reads: 3,977 |
By Jeremy Geelan “Regulations and compliance are key trust topics with regards to cloud solutions and technology,” noted Sven Denecken, Vice President, Strategy and Co-Innovation Cloud Solutions, SAP AG, in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “But it is also more than security of access – it is portability of data and a clear definition of where the data resides.”
Cloud Computing Journal: The move to cloud isn't about saving money, it is about saving time – agree or disagree?
Sve...Jun. 17, 2013 06:30 AM EDT Reads: 1,735 |
By Jeremy Geelan Many organizations want to expand upon the IaaS foundation to deliver cloud services in all forms – software, mobility, infrastructure and IT. Understanding the strategy, planning process and tools for this transformation will help catalyze changes in the way the business operates and deliver real value. Jun. 13, 2013 09:00 AM EDT Reads: 3,153 |
By Elizabeth White Jun. 13, 2013 07:00 AM EDT Reads: 2,307 |
By Jeremy Geelan IT has more opportunities than ever before with the growth in users, devices, data and secure cloud services. This creates not only a more enriching experience for users, but more opportunities for businesses. The key to capitalizing on these opportunities is to have the right tools in place to help scale operations. In his Day 3 Keynote at 12th Cloud Expo | Cloud Expo New York [June 10-13, 2013], Intel's Rob Crooke will describe the range of products that Intel provides to support different usa...Jun. 12, 2013 08:30 AM EDT Reads: 3,126 |
By Elizabeth White Jun. 11, 2013 12:00 PM EDT Reads: 2,006 |
By Elizabeth White One of the cloud’s biggest draws is the capability to virtualize computing resources, allowing it to be consumed with the click of a mouse. But behind that simple click is an enormous infrastructure challenge that has recently been cited as a major cause for slower enterprise adoption. Enterprises can better prepare for this shift and take full advantage of future computing benefits. Between architecture design and migration planning, the road can be long, so what do you do with your talent?
I...Jun. 11, 2013 09:00 AM EDT Reads: 4,200 |
By Pat Romanski In the old world of IT, if you didn't have hardware capacity or the budget to buy more, your project was dead in the water. Budget constraints can leave some of the best, most creative and most ingenious innovations on the cutting room floor. It’s a true dilemma for developers and innovators – why spend the time creating, when a project could be abandoned in a blink? That was the old world. In the new world of IT, developers rule. They have access to resources they can spin up instantly.
A hyb...Jun. 11, 2013 08:00 AM EDT Reads: 4,308 |
By Pat Romanski INetU, the industry's experts in complex hosting and a global provider of business-centric managed cloud and application hosting, has announced that Cloud Architect Rich Hand will be presenting "Private Cloud, Public Cloud - Is There a Third Option?" at the 12th International Cloud Expo taking place June 10-13, 2013 in New York City.
As more enterprise IT departments move into the cloud, many executives are evaluating whether to adopt a Public or Private cloud. The cost benefits of the Public ...Jun. 11, 2013 07:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,905 |
By Liz McMillan “I’m careful when using terms like Big Data, because it can mean so many things to different people,” explained Eric Hanselman, Chief Analyst at 451 Research, in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “There is huge value in analytics that companies can use to pull intelligence from a collection of data sources that are available in their businesses. The inexpensive storage that cloud services can offer make a great environment to pull together siloed data.”
Cloud Co...Jun. 10, 2013 01:00 PM EDT Reads: 2,164 |
- Cloud Expo New York: Cloud Is Changing the Economics of Business
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Nicos Vekiarides – TwinStrata
- How Platfora Is Transforming Hadoop
- Big Data Isn’t About the Database, It’s About the Application
- Cloud Expo New York: Rethink IT and Reinvent Business with IBM SmartCloud
- Cloud Expo New York: API Security, Does My Business Need an OAuth Server?
- Session Topics: 12th Cloud Expo / Cloud Expo New York
- Cloud Expo New York: Developing the World’s First IaaS Marketplace
- Cloud Expo NY: Best Practices for Delivering Oracle Database as a Service
- Cloud Expo New York: Aligning Your Cloud Security with the Business
- Cloud Expo NY: Best Practices for Architecting Your Cloud Infrastructure
- Measuring the Business Value of Cloud Computing
- Cloud Expo New York: Cloud Is Changing the Economics of Business
- AMD and Adobe Collaborate on Upcoming Version of Adobe Premiere Pro Software to Enable Breakthrough Video Editing Performance Through Open Standards
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Nicos Vekiarides – TwinStrata
- Cloud Expo New York: Deploying Hybrid Cloud for Performance and Uptime
- Predixion Software Announces General Availability of the Latest Version of its Predictive Analytics Platform
- How Platfora Is Transforming Hadoop
- Big Data Isn’t About the Database, It’s About the Application
- Cloud Expo New York: Rethink IT and Reinvent Business with IBM SmartCloud
- Cloud Expo New York: API Security, Does My Business Need an OAuth Server?
- Cloudant to Exhibit at Cloud Expo & Big Data Expo New York
- Session Topics: 12th Cloud Expo / Cloud Expo New York
- Cloud Expo New York: Basics of SSD Technology and Its Use in Cloud
- Cloud Expo New York: Best CIO Practices Shared from SHI’s Customers
- Think You Heard It All About The Best of the Best from CES? Well, Think Again ... My eHome® -- the Gotta-Have-It Multi-Play Solution -- Targeted for Launch in First Quarter 2014
- Cloud Computing and Big Data in 2013: What's Coming Next?
- Cloud Expo New York: Cloud Is Changing the Economics of Business
- Best Practices: The Role of API Management
- Cloud Expo New York: How to Use Google Apps Script
- Examining the True Cost of Big Data
- OpenFeint Co-Founder Peter Relan Launches OpenKit: A Backend-as-a-Service for Cross Platform Mobile Developers Seeking Cloud Data Storage, Leaderboards, Social Network Integration and More
- AMD and Adobe Collaborate on Upcoming Version of Adobe Premiere Pro Software to Enable Breakthrough Video Editing Performance Through Open Standards
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Nicos Vekiarides – TwinStrata
- MapR Technologies' Senior Principal Technologist to Present at the Upcoming Telecom Analytics Conference
- DataStax Announces Community Edition 1.2 -- Latest Version of Apache Cassandra(TM) Includes Free Version of OpsCenter, the #1 Visual Management and Monitoring Solution for Cassandra








“Regulations and compliance are key trust topics with regards to cloud solutions and technology,” noted Sven Denecken, Vice President, Strategy and Co-Innovation Cloud Solutions, SAP AG, in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “But it is also more than security of access – it is portability of data and a clear definition of where the data resides.”
Cloud Computing Journal: The move to cloud isn't about saving money, it is about saving time – agree or disagree?
Sve...
Many organizations want to expand upon the IaaS foundation to deliver cloud services in all forms – software, mobility, infrastructure and IT. Understanding the strategy, planning process and tools for this transformation will help catalyze changes in the way the business operates and deliver real value.
IT has more opportunities than ever before with the growth in users, devices, data and secure cloud services. This creates not only a more enriching experience for users, but more opportunities for businesses. The key to capitalizing on these opportunities is to have the right tools in place to help scale operations. In his Day 3 Keynote at 12th Cloud Expo | Cloud Expo New York [June 10-13, 2013], Intel's Rob Crooke will describe the range of products that Intel provides to support different usa...
One of the cloud’s biggest draws is the capability to virtualize computing resources, allowing it to be consumed with the click of a mouse. But behind that simple click is an enormous infrastructure challenge that has recently been cited as a major cause for slower enterprise adoption. Enterprises can better prepare for this shift and take full advantage of future computing benefits. Between architecture design and migration planning, the road can be long, so what do you do with your talent?
I...
In the old world of IT, if you didn't have hardware capacity or the budget to buy more, your project was dead in the water. Budget constraints can leave some of the best, most creative and most ingenious innovations on the cutting room floor. It’s a true dilemma for developers and innovators – why spend the time creating, when a project could be abandoned in a blink? That was the old world. In the new world of IT, developers rule. They have access to resources they can spin up instantly.
A hyb...
INetU, the industry's experts in complex hosting and a global provider of business-centric managed cloud and application hosting, has announced that Cloud Architect Rich Hand will be presenting "Private Cloud, Public Cloud - Is There a Third Option?" at the 12th International Cloud Expo taking place June 10-13, 2013 in New York City.
As more enterprise IT departments move into the cloud, many executives are evaluating whether to adopt a Public or Private cloud. The cost benefits of the Public ...
“I’m careful when using terms like Big Data, because it can mean so many things to different people,” explained Eric Hanselman, Chief Analyst at 451 Research, in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “There is huge value in analytics that companies can use to pull intelligence from a collection of data sources that are available in their businesses. The inexpensive storage that cloud services can offer make a great environment to pull together siloed data.”
Cloud Co...
I previously wrote a review of the Microsoft Azure public cloud and included a comparison between Azure and AWS (Amazon Web Services) and will now compare OpenStack and VMware vCloud. For a review of IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) see my blog post and video.
This table provides a simple and hi...
In this article, we’ll provide an overview of the Hyper-V enhancements in Windows Server 2012 R2. After you review these new capabilities, I’m sure you’ll see why the R2 release is a MAJOR RELEASE – so MUCH MORE than “just another” Service Pack release!
This month, we’ll be releasing a new article ...
It certainly has been a wild ride thus far for 2013 as we head into the second half. Breaches, hacks, exposures, leaks, along with things like BYOD and SDN should make the next 6 months interesting. From the many headlines in 2012, you’d think organizations would be locked down tight but alas, int...
One of the key aspects of cloud’s value to an organization is the way in which its implementation and processes can impact the bottom line of a business. Automation, in particular, is an issue in the cloud that can have a major effect on cost, and there are two major ways to think about what generat...
OpenStack is easily installed using a package called Packstack. Redhat is one of the primary contributors to packstack and my install experience is similar to the installation of RDO, described here
The procedure is quite simple:
Install Redhat, Fedora or Centos on one or more x86 servers.
I inst...
Software defined networking (SDN) has been in the spotlight since its conception in recent years because of the revolutionary potential that this emergent technology has for the future of IT networking. SDN is like a testament to the changing times. It is a confluence of several of the most signific...
The notion that PaaS exists solely "in the cloud" as a discrete environment of developer services is hampering the maturation of enterprise PaaS.
The three most common answers to "give me an example of PaaS" are: Force.com, Azure, Google. I didn't even need to do an unscientific Internet survey to ...
Interview with CEO Brad Bostic - hc1.com is committed to improving the quality of healthcare while reducing costs. We believe a critical ingredient to averting the current healthcare crisis faced by the US can only occur by improving the way healthcare professionals across the continuum of care man...
n the cloud doesn't matter whether you are running on an Open Source platform or not - it is NOT free because you pay for the service. And for long Open Source project have been funded through the services premiums that you pay. I would argue that Open Source vendors have mastered the way they can t...
Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) solutions allow IT organizations to deploy and manage virtual user desktops in the data center, eliminating the tedious management of numerous physical desktops. At the same time, virtual desktops allow end users to maintain their own personal desktops with acces...














